Realism and Its Role in US War Against Iraq Essay

Presence of biologic warf ar, inhumane attractionship, anti-democracy these were the reasons which were proclaimed in the past explaining US war against Iraq. I believe that US spearheaded by then President Bush played Realists in their decision-making vis a vis the issue at hand. Tony Blair himself admitted few months subsequently US won Iraq over their Head of State, ibn Talal Hussein Hussein, that there were no biological warfare prove to be under the custody of the latters government.Moreover, most nations believe that despite Husseins dictatorial means, he was nonetheless feared hence was open to maintain peaceful coexistence between two Islamic yet conflicting groups- the Sunni and Shiite. As regards, the question of the absence seizure of democratic government in Iraq, isnt the government activity and sustainability of any government dependent on its constituents/ contents?Who is the joined States to take away the chance from Iraqs own people to deal with their own gov ernment and its leader should there be a question of genuineness? Perhaps, guided by Realist perspective of International Relations, the pursuance reasons are more truthful security, statism, and self-help. Military great power according to Realism is a measure of political power relations among states alongside economic power. States are rational and unitary actors whose decisions are always ground on a calculation of survival and national security.There is the absence of universal principles while the solo guide of states in an anarchic set-up is pragmatic appraisal of other states actions in resolving problems. How then are these helpful in the compend of US intentions toward Iraq? US seeking to maintain its globular dominance would have to sustain military power. part Liberals and Idealists thought world peace could be succeed and that no more wars shall ever exist, US apparently showed that war is still a solution and a means to furthering state gains.Oil is Iraqs a scendant of wealth and power. If that was the only missing link to US superiority, by all means, US would get lease of it. Oil promotes military and economic power. It also gives US security against threats from North Korea. Hence, for me, it was the desire of the Bush governing to retain hegemonic status- free from external threats of every make that made US enter into a catastrophic war.